The Abrahamic Land Promise in Light of the Edenic Dominion Mandate

One area of biblical theology that I’ve been thinking more about lately is the relationship between the dominion mandate in Eden and the land promise given to Abraham. Brian Collins (Exegesis and Theology) has written a helpful series of posts interacting with Progressive Covenantalism, particularly on the themes of land and rest. While Collins critiques several of the specific proposals advanced by Progressive Covenantalist scholars—arguing that they require greater nuance (a concern I share)—he nevertheless acknowledges a genuine connection between the Abrahamic land promise and the Edenic dominion mandate.

In his post, Progressive Covenantalism and Land: Conclusion and Appeal, Collins writes:

“The central thesis of the Progressive Covenantalist view of the land, namely, that the land promise expands to encompass all of the new creation and all of the redeemed, is affirmed. This agreement rests on a shared belief that the material creation is significant in God’s redemptive plan. In addition, Progressive Covenantalists are correct in rooting the land theme in Eden. It is also correct to posit that the origins of this theme prior to the giving of the Abrahamic covenant point to a worldwide fulfillment of the theme in the new creation. Further, there is no disagreement with Progressive Covenantalists regarding the way the rest theme in Scripture points to the fulfilment of the land theme in the entire new creation.

These are points of genuine agreement, rather than concessions. My own thoughts on the land promise expanding to encompass the entire world developed in late 2010 and through 2011, prior to the publication of works by Progressive Covenantalists, as I worked through Scripture passages that speak of Israel possessing the nations and through a study on the theme of land in Joshua.”

Continue reading “The Abrahamic Land Promise in Light of the Edenic Dominion Mandate”

Ezekiel’s Temple and the New Covenant

Featured Blog: Selwin Christian

Today’s featured blog article was written by Selwin Christian back in April 2025 called Ezekiel’s Temple Sacrifices and the New Covenant. The article was written as a research paper for The Master’s Seminary.

I am thankful for Selwin and his continued to desire to study and grow in God’s Word. I pray that his work is an encouragement to study more seriously Ezekiel 40-48 and recognize how it comports with New Covenant realities.

Taken from the Introduction:

One of the hotly debated topics in the eschatological conundrum is to find the exact nature of Ezekiel’s temple sacrifices in the light of the New Covenant. Scripture must be read in its normal, plain sense unless the text demands some kind of symbolism. But those with allegorical hermeneutics reject the plain and literal view of the temple and hence find it utterly impossible to consider future sacrifices to be literal in the light of Christ and His finished work. We meet with the dilemma, how to exactly interpret Ezekiel’s temple and sacrifices. Those who apply allegorical sense, approach the meaning through the lens of the New Testament and try to read the New Testament into the Old Testament. We will first analyze the New Testament Priority hermeneutics. This paper will argue that the New testament priority hermeneutics disregards the basic details of the text for the Ezekiel’s temple sacrifices and misreads the authorial intent, though the later revelation is important, as far as the New Covenant is concerned the exegetical answer is found in the Old Testament itself without contradiction.

10 Reasons for a “Gap” in Daniel’s 70 Weeks

It is often assumed that dispensationalists invented the idea of a gap in Daniel’s seventy weeks in order to support their eschatological system. In reality, dispensational and non-dispensational interpreters have substantial textual and historical reasons for rejecting the view that the seventieth week was fulfilled by AD 40. The following are some of the strongest arguments supporting a gap between the sixty-ninth and seventieth weeks.

Continue reading “10 Reasons for a “Gap” in Daniel’s 70 Weeks”

Future Sacrifices and the Once-for-All Cross: Harmonizing Ezekiel and Hebrews

Let’s talk Ezekiel 40-48!

After years of dialogue with non-dispensationalists over this passage, I have repeatedly encountered the same interpretive problems surrounding these nine chapters of Scripture. At the core of many of these disagreements is what has been termed a “New Testament Priority Presupposition.” This approach grants the New Testament interpretive primacy when reading the Bible, often described as viewing the Old Testament through the lens of the New Testament. In this case the book of Hebrews is given interpretive priority over Ezekiel and is used to interpret the book of Ezekiel.

Continue reading “Future Sacrifices and the Once-for-All Cross: Harmonizing Ezekiel and Hebrews”

The New Covenant – Spiritual & Physical Dimensions

The New Covenant (NC) is far more comprehensive than we often acknowledge. If one reduces the NC merely to the spiritual blessings the church enjoys in Christ, while neglecting its physical and national dimensions, the result is an essentially Platonic reading of the promises. What is needed is a balanced and objective assessment that gives full weight to all relevant biblical data. Moreover, a strictly redemptive-historical hermeneutic can create additional tension, as it often tends to emphasize the spiritual aspects of the covenant while minimizing or reinterpreting its physical and territorial components.

Continue reading “The New Covenant – Spiritual & Physical Dimensions”

Common Misconceptions About Dispensationalism

If you’re a Dispensationalist, like me, then I am sure you’re beginning to become all too familiar with common misconceptions/myths leveled against our theology. It seems nowadays that all I do on social media is correct misconceptions about our position.

In this blog article I will attempt to once and for all correct several misconceptions that the opposition makes about our theology.

Continue reading “Common Misconceptions About Dispensationalism”

Are Dispensationalists Pessimists?

I could never be a Dispensational Premillennialist because they are pessimistic/defeatists who have a negative view of reality, they don’t want to be involved in society, they are just waiting around for the rapture. I’d rather be an optimist believing in victory not defeat.”  

Sound familiar? It sure does for me. I have heard and read these sorts of claims online for the last year or so since the resurgence of Postmillennialism. However, are these claims justified? Do these claims truly reflect the reality of Dispensational theology? Are Dispensationalists pessimists in the way that they are portrayed? I hope that my article will challenge the claims of the Postmillennialist and will provide further insight into why we believe what we do.

Continue reading “Are Dispensationalists Pessimists?”

Premillennialism – The Biblical Paradigm

Let me start by saying that I believe this is an incredibly important topic that requires clarity in this day and age. As I peruse social media I see memes and mockeries directed at Premillennialists attempting to dismiss the sound biblical position by poking fun at it. It seems that many are developing a sort of theology based around quick baseless assertions and relying on what they are hearing from secondary sources, rather than from the authors of the positions. I hope that this post will provide clarity for those who are seriously interested in studying this topic.

Continue reading “Premillennialism – The Biblical Paradigm”

Israel’s Future – An Exegetical Analysis of Romans 11:1-36

Here is my exegetical analysis of Romans 11:1-36. It is my hope to demonstrate the future plan of God regarding ethnic Israel, and that God has not and will not forget about them. Ethnic Israel still has a future in God’s decree, and this passage breaks down that plan.

Continue reading “Israel’s Future – An Exegetical Analysis of Romans 11:1-36”

All Things are put in Subjection – An Exegetical Analysis of 1 Corinthians 15:20-28

It has been said to me many times that 1 Corinthians 15:20-28 is a refuter to the Premillennial interpretation of Scripture. I have yet to find the argument appealing or convincing. Here is my exegetical analysis of 1 Corinthians 15:20-28 demonstrating the compatibility of our position with the text.

Continue reading “All Things are put in Subjection – An Exegetical Analysis of 1 Corinthians 15:20-28”