Pre-Darby Pretribulationism: A Historical Survey

“What is clear from all the recent work on the history of eschatology and millennialism is that John Nelson Darby did not create the dispensational system out of whole cloth by himself in the nineteenth century. Certain elements of that system pre-dated Darby. Prior to Darby, those elements existed in various non-dispensationalist theological systems. The division of history into eras pre-dated Darby in non-dispensationalist systems. Premillennialism pre-dated Darby in non-dispensationalist systems. Philosemitism pre-dated Darby in non-dispensationalist systems. There were tributaries that fed into the larger stream that became dispensationalism. In the nineteenth century, Darby and others took these already existing ideas, added a few of their own, and put them together in an altogether new way. They built a unique new house.”
— Keith Mathison, https://www.keithmathison.org/post/dispensationalism-before-darby

Did dispensational pretribulationism exist before Darby? Absolutely—at least in its “proto” stages. I’ve put together a list of key resources that track pretribulationism prior to Darby’s time. The common claim that Darby either stole the idea from Margaret MacDonald or invented it out of thin air is simply a myth.

Continue reading “Pre-Darby Pretribulationism: A Historical Survey”

The Day of the Lord – An Exegetical Analysis of 2 Thessalonians 2:1-17

Here is my exegetical analysis of 2 Thessalonians 2:1-17 which will demonstrate the validity of the Dispensational/Premillennial perspective articulated by Paul.

UPDATE: Please see my revised exegetical analysis of 2 Thessalonians 2:1-17, which I go more into depth in some areas, and update (vs.3) to what I believe is a more biblically grounded position. My prayer is that this will be a blessing to you.

Continue reading “The Day of the Lord – An Exegetical Analysis of 2 Thessalonians 2:1-17”

A Response to Charles Cooper (Pre-Wrath) on “A Review of Ian Hicks’ Article about 2 Thessalonians 2:1-17”

I am so ecstatic that anyone would take 50 minutes of their lives to respond to me about an article that I posted here on this website. So, I am looking forward to responding to Charles Cooper, a Pre-wrath advocate, on his comments of my article, entitled: An Exegetical Analysis of 2 Thessalonians 2:1-17. If you would like to watch his video critiquing me please click here.

Continue reading “A Response to Charles Cooper (Pre-Wrath) on “A Review of Ian Hicks’ Article about 2 Thessalonians 2:1-17””

Pretribulationalism – The Biblical Paradigm

The topic of the rapture is one of the most hotly contested topics in modern times. It can excite those who are seeking for imminent return of the Lord prior to Daniel’s 70th week and it can anger those who believe that the doctrine of the pretribulational rapture is merely a modern fantasy invented by “escapists” and “pessimists”.

It is my desire here to present a cumulative case for the pretribulational rapture. Let me state at the outset that no single text of scripture validates a doctrine. We should not be looking for a singular verse to validate a premise, but rather at what totascriptura says. If, we are to take the whole Word of God seriously, then we wouldn’t expect a singular verse to say something like, “the rapture occurs before Daniel’s 70th week”, but rather that all the evidence points us to a clear conclusion. Pretribulationalism isn’t built off of a singular proof-text, and therefore I won’t be using an isolated text to argue for pretribulationalism. I will demonstrate based upon totascriptura that the evidence best leads to a rapture that is a.) distinct from the second coming, and b.) before the tribulation (i.e. Daniel’s 70th week).

Continue reading “Pretribulationalism – The Biblical Paradigm”